Skip to main content

Punishing People Doesn't Atone for Their Sin

  Little do some people know, punishing others for their sin will not atone for their sin, abrogate their sin, take care of their sin, or cleanse them of their sin. I am mainly speaking here about the misguided notion of humans punishing other humans for their sins.  Only Jesus Christ can take away sin because he was considered as a lamb without spot or blemish, the perfect sacrifice (according to 1 Peter 1:19, John 1:29, Hebrews 10:12).  Furthermore, the sacrifice of Jesus Christ was once for all and doesn't require any further sacrificial atonement in any capacity whatsoever, and this concept is repeated often in the book of Hebrews (for example, Hebrews 9:12, 10:10, 10:14).
  There are forms of "punishing" people in church discipline and other aspects of life, but actual consequences never atone for people's sin, they only urge people to repent. Procedures should always resemble Biblical steps such as Matthew 18:15-17.
  People, in their wicked human nature, always tend to take their striving for revenge, vengeance, and punishment far beyond the Biblical idea of "eye for an eye."  A person who loses their eye typically wants to cut another's head off and eat their heart for breakfast. That is unrighteous behavior and thinking, and people should be using the civil and criminal courts to seek justice anyway. Jesus warned people in the sermon on the mount, "...do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also" (Matthew 5:39).
  A study of the civil ordinances in the Old Testament will reveal that many of the statutes follow the principle of restorative justice and restitution. The offender pays back the victim in a sum equivalent to the wrongdoing. Modern criminal justice should generally reflect the principles found in the civil ordinances of the Mosaic Law.
   All of this is notwithstanding the specific way in which God's wrath might be satisfied by punishing people in hell (though it is eternal punishment, so we can't assume the wrath is ever satisfied). The whole first part of this post was to communicate specifically as to how things are "under the sun" in terms of human relations (and what we have to consider about Jesus Christ), not how God's wrath is poured out against the unsaved. However, atonement has the specific connotation of reconciliation- sinners reconciling with a holy and just God. "When we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to Him [God] through the death of his Son (Romans 5:10; see also 2 Cor 5:18-19, Ephesians 2:16; Colossians 1:20). Punishment in hell has no aspect of reconciliation that I've ever seen the scriptures.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apologies to the Trump Campaign

   I received your messages (Donald Trump and son), I just haven't checked that email account often enough. I am well aware that someone with you follows my posts here, ever since my original idea to have a wealthy man run for President has come to fruition somehow. The only thing I would have to communicate is that this was never supposed to be a purely political blog. I started the blog to write about whatever I wanted to, or whatever I was interested in. The "general topic" theme gives me the freedom to write freely across subject areas. If my ideas have helped you somehow, I did not realize that. Let me see what I can do to help you further, though. I think you should continue giving America a message of hope based on ideas and values our country was founded on, and you won't be able to really go wrong. Too often Democrats win elections not by their own merit, but by a smear campaign against their opponent. That's what they've tried to do, it looks like. ...

The Process Used in Writing "The Semantolkino'hara" book

     People wanted to learn the process by which I wrote "The Semantolkino'hara," and they seem to think the process is more valuable than the content of the book. Well....the book is really quite good and well-written. (It can be purchased here: http://www.magcloud.com/browse/issue/825648  ) The musical materials discussed are invaluable. The way the book came about is as interesting as the process used, and the way it came was infused together with the process used. The introduction in the book describes how I was thinking about everything, and kind of explains the process:       FROM THE INTRODUCTION:       "The writing of this book started with the idea of subjecting certain musical materials of my life to a method of human conjunctive analysis combining the objective tools of musical analysis with subjective human studies and theology, allowing for the possibility of reinterpretable studies. After a preliminary amount of inv...

This performance of "Lowzer" is better than the other performance of "Lozer"

   So I uncovered and uploaded another different "live" performance of the Sullivan's Dog song "Lowzer" from our days of performing (notice how I play with the spelling on purpose to upset people who take things too seriously?) Please disregard my complaining in the previous post about the vocal balance in the other version and about it being the only surviving version. Praise God this other version exists so people can hear a version closer to how it should really sound. Oh yeah, for those who don't know, I am the guitar player on the left hand side who is difficult to see, but I am not the bass player on the left who can be prominently seen. My playing can be heard quite well in the intro, though.      And the video URL:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T10OtiZFOZA&feature=youtu.be