Skip to main content

Punishing People Doesn't Atone for Their Sin

  Little do some people know, punishing others for their sin will not atone for their sin, abrogate their sin, take care of their sin, or cleanse them of their sin. I am mainly speaking here about the misguided notion of humans punishing other humans for their sins.  Only Jesus Christ can take away sin because he was considered as a lamb without spot or blemish, the perfect sacrifice (according to 1 Peter 1:19, John 1:29, Hebrews 10:12).  Furthermore, the sacrifice of Jesus Christ was once for all and doesn't require any further sacrificial atonement in any capacity whatsoever, and this concept is repeated often in the book of Hebrews (for example, Hebrews 9:12, 10:10, 10:14).
  There are forms of "punishing" people in church discipline and other aspects of life, but actual consequences never atone for people's sin, they only urge people to repent. Procedures should always resemble Biblical steps such as Matthew 18:15-17.
  People, in their wicked human nature, always tend to take their striving for revenge, vengeance, and punishment far beyond the Biblical idea of "eye for an eye."  A person who loses their eye typically wants to cut another's head off and eat their heart for breakfast. That is unrighteous behavior and thinking, and people should be using the civil and criminal courts to seek justice anyway. Jesus warned people in the sermon on the mount, "...do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also" (Matthew 5:39).
  A study of the civil ordinances in the Old Testament will reveal that many of the statutes follow the principle of restorative justice and restitution. The offender pays back the victim in a sum equivalent to the wrongdoing. Modern criminal justice should generally reflect the principles found in the civil ordinances of the Mosaic Law.
   All of this is notwithstanding the specific way in which God's wrath might be satisfied by punishing people in hell (though it is eternal punishment, so we can't assume the wrath is ever satisfied). The whole first part of this post was to communicate specifically as to how things are "under the sun" in terms of human relations (and what we have to consider about Jesus Christ), not how God's wrath is poured out against the unsaved. However, atonement has the specific connotation of reconciliation- sinners reconciling with a holy and just God. "When we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to Him [God] through the death of his Son (Romans 5:10; see also 2 Cor 5:18-19, Ephesians 2:16; Colossians 1:20). Punishment in hell has no aspect of reconciliation that I've ever seen the scriptures.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Night Fever," new song of mine could have many biblical implications

    Many people think of going to do something for the Lord like the preach the gospel, but will they really consider what the backlash would or could be like against them in many forms?     During my years of preaching with and alongside Third Street Ministries the typical level of discomfort normally experienced was just the prodding of scoffers and mockers in the mission field. It was kept from encroaching on our personal lives for an extended time, even despite posting videos. My testimony would indicate just how cautious, circumspect, and in agreement with your fellow believers you have to be in order to avoid a problem. That is especially true if you are working at the "trenches" level of confronting the unbelieving world.     In this new song "Night Fever," I just describe in vague terms one day in July 2011 when my ministry efforts with them finally got derailed more seriously. Tom of 1tmoch fame called my cellphone (or we called each other) and I planned to

A Song No One Knew Could Be About John the Baptist

     I’ve recently come to the conclusion that “One More Try” by George Michael could have one interpretation as being about John the Baptist. This would indeed a highly compelling interpretation of the song. The song seems to depict a man, sung in first person narrative (I interpret as being John the Baptist), upset by his previous teacher (I interpret here as Jesus), and trying to reason with another person he wants as his lover. This third person, (the lover), for the sake of my interpretation could be Salome, or someone else. The way that the video depicts him confined in a room with stained glass windows makes me feel like it’s John singing from prison before he was beheaded. He’s saying that it’s too bad he can’t see Jesus any longer, and could she please give him one more try even though he’s behind bars.       I happen to like this interpretation a lot, because it makes John the Baptist look like a rockstar. He was indeed said by Christ as being “Elijah who was to come” Matthe

Say "Hello" to the Man Behind the Curtain (He's the stalker you wanted to know about)

    I'm sure that a lot of people have sensed or noticed heightened vigilance in society over "stalkers." What most people have not probably considered is that the cause of the phenomenon of concern could be subterfuge of subconscious mechanisms (in coordination possibly with covert or subliminal efforts by corporations) by which people's unconscious guilt for participating with, being compliant with, complicit with, (or otherwise silently approving) harmful systems that do actually "stalk" average citizens for real, is projected on someone other than the real cause of their inner distress, worry, and heavy-laden guilt. These systems could include corporate America, the banking industry, the government (the IRS mostly comes to mind- thank you David Foster Wallace for The Pale King, the book from which I took down some nice notes to go over later, mainly concerning the political/economic theories of Alexis de Tocqueville, participatory democracy, corporations