Skip to main content

Going Against One's Word or Breaking Vows

    Inherent in the problem having to do with breaking a vow that one has previously made (from a Biblical point of view) is the classic distinction between "law" and "grace" which is talked about a great in the writings of Paul. It is not advisable to make a vow (Matthew 5:34-35), or to break a vow (Matthew 5:33), obviously because of the strict justice of God and His righteous standard. However, to think that a vow made foolishly, rashly, in error, while intoxicated, poisoned, mentally compromised, etc, must always be observed forever, is not only a wrong way or practice for being too legalistic, it would practically be heresy because one would be ignoring what Jesus Christ accomplished on the cross. The sacrifice of Jesus on the cross does away with the ceremonial ordinances of the Old Testament by fulfilling them, bringing them to completion in the bringing of a new covenant in Him. Well guess what? In the Old Testament ceremonial ordinances the Jews had a way to have their vows cleared, forgiven, and handled on the Day of Atonement, the feast of Yom Kippur (Leviticus 16). The special song they sing for the annulment of vows is called Kol Nidre. For those who are in Christ now, in the new covenant, sins such as that are dealt with in him (1 John 1:9, 1 John 2:1-2). One cannot be in Christ and have live a lifestyle of sin, though (1 John 2:4). So while one might mistakenly make a vow that they can't or shouldn't keep, to intentionally do that repetitively as a lifestyle means that they are so in sin that their very salvation could be called into question.
   Even in the Old Testament it is shown that God has provided for the fact that humans make mistakes and are not perfect completely like He is. For example, Leviticus 27 gives valuations for property, livestock, and persons so that in the case that the actual thing vowed cannot be given, then people could donate the monetary equivalent of their vow. For more on Leviticus 27, see here 
   I need to make several other caveats. A vow made with the name of God is different from one made not with God's name, because one would be breaking the third commandment by breaking the first type. A formal vow or oath is different from just breaking one's word. The purpose of an oath is it's binding value, and so when one vows or oaths, their attention is on that purpose. This is different than in regular conversation when people might say things without thinking. The numerous provisions in the Old Testament for sins committed unintentionally (such as for example Leviticus 4) are quite obviously replaced in the new covenant by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Sins committed unintentionally were quite obviously handled at the cross of Jesus by His sacrifice.
   If you made a bad vow that you can't keep, and you're not sure if God is forgiving you, you should talk to your pastor, pray to God about it, and also look in the Bible. Also, no one has to keep an oath or vow to do something which would make them be in sin (Acts 23:12-22, Numbers 30:5-13).
   Sometimes if someone cannot keep their word, and they did not vow in God's name, it is possible that the only authority holding them in account directly is other men because God has basically forgiven them for that specific sin. (I am saying this because people in their wicked nature can be very ungracious while God's grace is good). They could have a different sin for failing to reconcile, though, because Jesus said in Matthew 5:23-24, "Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering."
   Just to help everyone, I am providing quotes from the book of Romans here which are regarding law and grace.
   "Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our body to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter."  Romans 7:4-6
   "Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,  so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.  For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so,  and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
However, you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you."  Romans 8:1-9

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...

This performance of "Lowzer" is better than the other performance of "Lozer"

   So I uncovered and uploaded another different "live" performance of the Sullivan's Dog song "Lowzer" from our days of performing (notice how I play with the spelling on purpose to upset people who take things too seriously?) Please disregard my complaining in the previous post about the vocal balance in the other version and about it being the only surviving version. Praise God this other version exists so people can hear a version closer to how it should really sound. Oh yeah, for those who don't know, I am the guitar player on the left hand side who is difficult to see, but I am not the bass player on the left who can be prominently seen. My playing can be heard quite well in the intro, though.      And the video URL:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T10OtiZFOZA&feature=youtu.be