Skip to main content

David Black- "Medicine Fight" song re-release March 24th

  My song "Medicine Fight" will be re-released to most digital channels on March 24th, 2016.  People will find it interesting that "Medicine Fight" pre-dates Rachel Platten's "Fight Song" (the song where the chorus goes-"this is my fight song, take back my life song, etc) because I put a rough live version on YouTube in 2013 and Rachel Platten "Fight Song" was recorded in 2014.
See the official YouTube version of "Medicine Fight" to hear it:
Video- "Medicine Fight" song

Rachel Platten "Fight Song"-  https://youtu.be/xo1VInw-SKc

My rough sketch of "Medicine Fight from 2013- rough sketch "Medicine Fight"

   "Medicine Fight" will be on the following digital stores/channels-
iTunes
Apple Music
You Tube Art Tracks
Spotify
Amazon Music
Google Play
Deezer
Rhapsody
eMusic
Simfy Africa
iHeart Radio
MediaNet
VerveLife
Tidal
Gracenote
Shazam
7Digital
Juke
Slacker
Guvera
KKBox
Akazoo
Anghami
Spinlet
Neurotic Media
Yandex
Target Music
ClaroMusica
Zvooq
Saavn
NMusic
8tracks
Q.Sic
Cur

  • YouTube Art Tracks
    •  
  • iTunes
    •  
  • Apple Music
    •  
  • Spotify
    •  
  • Amazon Music
    •  
  • Google Play
    •  
  • Deezer
    •  
  • Groove
    •  
  • Rhapsody
    •  
  • eMusic
  • Simfy Africa
    •  
  • iHeartRadio
    •  
  • MediaNet
    •  
  • VerveLife
    •  
  • Tidal
    •  
  • Gracenote
    •  
  • Shazam
    •  
  • 7Digital
    •  
  • Juke
    •  
  • Slacker
  • Guvera
    •  
  • KKBox
    •  
  • Akazoo
    •  
  • Anghami
    •  
  • Spinlet
    •  
  • Neurotic Media
    •  
  • Yandex
    •  
  • Target Music
    •  
  • ClaroMusica
    •  
  • Zvooq
  • Saavn
    •  
  • NMusic
    •  
  • 8tracks
    •  
  • Q.Sic
    •  
  • Cur

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

We Have Freedom of Speech, right?

   How come everyone seems so afraid to speak against the real politik in our country? We used to have lively political discussion and dissent, and now people with minority opinions seem scoffed at and outcast. This is a bad trend, don't go in that way. The first amendment was set up with one of the intentions being that people would be able to criticize those in charge. It is unbelievable that people could say that a scenario happened like Pearl Jams' "Dissident" describes, and these things happen on American soil?    The 1992 Presidential election is something to look to consider the way things used to be. Third party independent candidate Ross Perot was considered as having equal weight as the two other candidates. There was a strong freedom of the thought in the political spectrum. Perot's money went a long way for him. All things considered, though, billionaires still exist. Where are the Ross Perots of our time, then, who are not afraid to jump in and shake...
Post a Comment
Read more