Skip to main content

Personality Type Differences Get Misunderstood

   There are things about personality types and differences which I think the population as a whole does not understand. It would not be stretch, either, to say that mental health professionals often don't account for personality types which are not among the more "common" types. There are personality types which are more common statistically than other types, and that creates real world "norms."  However, this is not fair to people with rare personality types who have valuable talents, skills, pursuits, influence, because for some reason society values "normalcy" in terms of behavior, conversation, etc.
http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/my-mbti-results/how-frequent-is-my-type.asp
   It is not fair to people who have more quiet or reticent personalities to be judged harshly for being to quiet and reticent. It doesn't mean that they are afraid of people, or uninterested in others. The case of the matter is simply that they have a personality which is more introverted and they probably have a rich inner life. It should never be the aim of mental health professionals to mold people into "normal' personalities so that everyone is talkative, or everyone seems "normal" in terms of personality. Also, quiet people can choose career paths that are suitable to their personality, but people still persist in judging them harshly, and this should not happen.
   It is not the case that glibness is the same thing as intelligence. There are people who possess high intelligence who are uncomfortable talking at great length with convincing methods. Others who speak long with great fluency and length may not be the sharpest tools in the shed (to use an American idiom). News anchors who read from teleprompters sometimes don't have to know or memorize what they are saying to people. Some people, however, have the perfect combination of glibness, fluency in speech, and high intelligence. What I mean by all this is that people should not judge by appearances.
   Furthermore, God created, through indirect causes, people with all different kinds of talents and skills. It is reprehensible that people with more artistic proclivities get looked down upon has having less valuable skills, or less valuable thinking processes, or that they are somehow less valuable in the eyes of God.  Many artists think extremely logically and are capable of thinking at high level. God created people of different types, possibly so that the whole gamut of human pursuits would testify to His glory.  No one should be considered mentally ill or handicapped if their thinking is naturally creative (or "divergent").  Many divergent thinkers can flick the switch on themselves and think convegently whenever they want to.  Many erroneously think that unless you constantly focus your thinking on one pattern of logical thinking on one topic, that you are not healthy or that you are crazy. That is sad, wrong, and ignorant. Many people are different in their ways of thinking, but it doesn't mean that they are wrong, unhealthy, or crazy. It just may be that God intended them for creative, artistic, or unusual endeavors to glorify Him.
  A little research on the internet will show that daydreaming has benefits which science has validated.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/03/mind-wandering_n_4024852.html
   No matter how anyone thinks, the laws of logic are always valid, and logic should be taught to more people. Also, despite personality types there are qualities expressed in the teachings of Jesus Christ which are more desirable than others, in terms of our relationship to our Lord and our relationships to others. These qualities include, but are not limited to: humility, meekness, gentleness, compassion, mournfulness, kindness, etc.
    "Open your mouth for the mute, For the rights of all the unfortunate. Open your mouth, judge righteously, And defend the rights of the afflicted and needy." Proverbs 31:8-9
   "How long will you judge unjustly And show partiality to the wicked? Selah. Vindicate the weak and fatherless; Do justice to the afflicted and destitute." Psalm 82:2-3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...

Is Anybody Thinking Whatsoever?

See my comments below......    Let me explain further. According to Catholic dogma/teaching, they must oppose abortion "in all forms."  See the Catholic Catechism, which clearly states in 2272  "Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life"  Therefore, Catholics CANNOT vote for Hillary Clinton. If they don't like Donald Trump they have to find an independent party they agree with and vote for that person. They would be sinning according to their own religious worldview if they actually voted for Hillary Clinton.  link to Catholic Catechism  (on abortion)    Catholics should also consider the Catholic sin of "scandal." It is a sin for them to vote for Hillary Clinton. To quote the Catholic Catechism, "Therefore, they are guilty of scandal who establish laws or social structures leading to the decline of morals and the c...