Skip to main content

Personality Type Differences Get Misunderstood

   There are things about personality types and differences which I think the population as a whole does not understand. It would not be stretch, either, to say that mental health professionals often don't account for personality types which are not among the more "common" types. There are personality types which are more common statistically than other types, and that creates real world "norms."  However, this is not fair to people with rare personality types who have valuable talents, skills, pursuits, influence, because for some reason society values "normalcy" in terms of behavior, conversation, etc.
http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/my-mbti-results/how-frequent-is-my-type.asp
   It is not fair to people who have more quiet or reticent personalities to be judged harshly for being to quiet and reticent. It doesn't mean that they are afraid of people, or uninterested in others. The case of the matter is simply that they have a personality which is more introverted and they probably have a rich inner life. It should never be the aim of mental health professionals to mold people into "normal' personalities so that everyone is talkative, or everyone seems "normal" in terms of personality. Also, quiet people can choose career paths that are suitable to their personality, but people still persist in judging them harshly, and this should not happen.
   It is not the case that glibness is the same thing as intelligence. There are people who possess high intelligence who are uncomfortable talking at great length with convincing methods. Others who speak long with great fluency and length may not be the sharpest tools in the shed (to use an American idiom). News anchors who read from teleprompters sometimes don't have to know or memorize what they are saying to people. Some people, however, have the perfect combination of glibness, fluency in speech, and high intelligence. What I mean by all this is that people should not judge by appearances.
   Furthermore, God created, through indirect causes, people with all different kinds of talents and skills. It is reprehensible that people with more artistic proclivities get looked down upon has having less valuable skills, or less valuable thinking processes, or that they are somehow less valuable in the eyes of God.  Many artists think extremely logically and are capable of thinking at high level. God created people of different types, possibly so that the whole gamut of human pursuits would testify to His glory.  No one should be considered mentally ill or handicapped if their thinking is naturally creative (or "divergent").  Many divergent thinkers can flick the switch on themselves and think convegently whenever they want to.  Many erroneously think that unless you constantly focus your thinking on one pattern of logical thinking on one topic, that you are not healthy or that you are crazy. That is sad, wrong, and ignorant. Many people are different in their ways of thinking, but it doesn't mean that they are wrong, unhealthy, or crazy. It just may be that God intended them for creative, artistic, or unusual endeavors to glorify Him.
  A little research on the internet will show that daydreaming has benefits which science has validated.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/03/mind-wandering_n_4024852.html
   No matter how anyone thinks, the laws of logic are always valid, and logic should be taught to more people. Also, despite personality types there are qualities expressed in the teachings of Jesus Christ which are more desirable than others, in terms of our relationship to our Lord and our relationships to others. These qualities include, but are not limited to: humility, meekness, gentleness, compassion, mournfulness, kindness, etc.
    "Open your mouth for the mute, For the rights of all the unfortunate. Open your mouth, judge righteously, And defend the rights of the afflicted and needy." Proverbs 31:8-9
   "How long will you judge unjustly And show partiality to the wicked? Selah. Vindicate the weak and fatherless; Do justice to the afflicted and destitute." Psalm 82:2-3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Night Fever," new song of mine could have many biblical implications

    Many people think of going to do something for the Lord like the preach the gospel, but will they really consider what the backlash would or could be like against them in many forms?     During my years of preaching with and alongside Third Street Ministries the typical level of discomfort normally experienced was just the prodding of scoffers and mockers in the mission field. It was kept from encroaching on our personal lives for an extended time, even despite posting videos. My testimony would indicate just how cautious, circumspect, and in agreement with your fellow believers you have to be in order to avoid a problem. That is especially true if you are working at the "trenches" level of confronting the unbelieving world.     In this new song "Night Fever," I just describe in vague terms one day in July 2011 when my ministry efforts with them finally got derailed more seriously. Tom of 1tmoch fame called my cellphone (or we called each other) and I planned to

A Song No One Knew Could Be About John the Baptist

     I’ve recently come to the conclusion that “One More Try” by George Michael could have one interpretation as being about John the Baptist. This would indeed a highly compelling interpretation of the song. The song seems to depict a man, sung in first person narrative (I interpret as being John the Baptist), upset by his previous teacher (I interpret here as Jesus), and trying to reason with another person he wants as his lover. This third person, (the lover), for the sake of my interpretation could be Salome, or someone else. The way that the video depicts him confined in a room with stained glass windows makes me feel like it’s John singing from prison before he was beheaded. He’s saying that it’s too bad he can’t see Jesus any longer, and could she please give him one more try even though he’s behind bars.       I happen to like this interpretation a lot, because it makes John the Baptist look like a rockstar. He was indeed said by Christ as being “Elijah who was to come” Matthe

Say "Hello" to the Man Behind the Curtain (He's the stalker you wanted to know about)

    I'm sure that a lot of people have sensed or noticed heightened vigilance in society over "stalkers." What most people have not probably considered is that the cause of the phenomenon of concern could be subterfuge of subconscious mechanisms (in coordination possibly with covert or subliminal efforts by corporations) by which people's unconscious guilt for participating with, being compliant with, complicit with, (or otherwise silently approving) harmful systems that do actually "stalk" average citizens for real, is projected on someone other than the real cause of their inner distress, worry, and heavy-laden guilt. These systems could include corporate America, the banking industry, the government (the IRS mostly comes to mind- thank you David Foster Wallace for The Pale King, the book from which I took down some nice notes to go over later, mainly concerning the political/economic theories of Alexis de Tocqueville, participatory democracy, corporations