Skip to main content

This is why to stop the Islamic State Caliphate Harshly

   I saw this news article this morning about the beheading of a citizen in Okalahoma

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-woman-beheaded-at-oklahoma-workplace/

   The United States should stop the IS caliphate in the Middle East very harshly with a strong show of nuclear force to precisely make an example out of them. I tried to tell people this stuff would happen here and they mocked and scoffed. If people put up with threatening harsh Islamists for the sake of tolerance, this is what you will get. We have religious freedom, yes, but take a stand against evil please and have a sense of decency.  If we do not take a stronger stand against them in the Middle East, it will spread on U.S. soil and everyone will be very sorry. Stomp them out over there. Rammstein them. Pummel them with weaponry. End the discussion fast. Floor it on them.  Level the entire area down to where you can till the whole region like a field, just like Jerusalem was once leveled down and they tilled the area like a field. Shock the living daylights out of the whole world with appropriate use of American power and authority.
   Islam is a fascist, totalitarian, theocratic ideology that promotes violence and murder to promote their agenda. People who hold to that in the U.S. are the same people group as ISIS or IS. It is like the spread of a communist threat. The people like the perpetrator in this news story are part of the same people group as IS or ISIS because they hold to and practice the same ideology.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

We Have Freedom of Speech, right?

   How come everyone seems so afraid to speak against the real politik in our country? We used to have lively political discussion and dissent, and now people with minority opinions seem scoffed at and outcast. This is a bad trend, don't go in that way. The first amendment was set up with one of the intentions being that people would be able to criticize those in charge. It is unbelievable that people could say that a scenario happened like Pearl Jams' "Dissident" describes, and these things happen on American soil?    The 1992 Presidential election is something to look to consider the way things used to be. Third party independent candidate Ross Perot was considered as having equal weight as the two other candidates. There was a strong freedom of the thought in the political spectrum. Perot's money went a long way for him. All things considered, though, billionaires still exist. Where are the Ross Perots of our time, then, who are not afraid to jump in and shake...
Post a Comment
Read more