Skip to main content

The "Art-Code" Problem Solving Method

   This is a process that I, Mr. Black, invented (Praise God). Since I'm giving this away virtually for free, I'm going to leave it somewhat sketch and just copy directly from my notes from the day I thought of it. I'm nice enough, after all, to write it down for free. Don't expect me to teach it to you perfectly, then, when this is the kind of information which should cost money.
   Art-Code Problem-Solving Method
Organized principles- time sharing-pass the ball, contrasting ideas, systematic thinking, balance of creativity/art and facts, leader/follower, hierarchy, artforms limited to 2 at a time, balance of objects (variety), time limit?  Decide topic and artforms, present objects, chance strategies- drawing word cards, drawing a CD.
Beforehand, pray for a solution
1] State the problem and possible consequences
   -all related concepts involved
2] Epic brainstorm
   -possible solutions, how to work out through art (further solve), how to use the objects, other art pieces and songs related, related fields and concepts
3] Work out through Art-code performance/ composition  [improvised?]
4] Debate possible solutions gleaned/ or debate which team has better art solution
   -could include mock trial with leader or judge
  -  include "past cases"
5] Act out the solution (work of art) as decided on by the leader (performance of the composition)
6] Write down and archive the session and findings
    -could be used in future "cases"
7]  Pray to thank God

Applications- remote viewing, historical problems, medical diagnostics, a team game itself, football strategery, business, creative writing, theology and apologetics, societal problems, personal problems, search and rescue, theatrical improv, arbitration/dispute settlement, negotiation, bible study, scientific problems, cosmic problems, information recovery, legal theories, crime investigation, military strategery, supernatural investigation, art interpretation, combining ideas across disciplines, societal problems, political campaign strategery
state the problem in subject/answer counterpoint
could be worked as a "problem solving business"

kinks in the process-
specialized areas (like medical) seem to require licensed oversight or research protocols

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Anybody Thinking Whatsoever?

See my comments below......    Let me explain further. According to Catholic dogma/teaching, they must oppose abortion "in all forms."  See the Catholic Catechism, which clearly states in 2272  "Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life"  Therefore, Catholics CANNOT vote for Hillary Clinton. If they don't like Donald Trump they have to find an independent party they agree with and vote for that person. They would be sinning according to their own religious worldview if they actually voted for Hillary Clinton.  link to Catholic Catechism  (on abortion)    Catholics should also consider the Catholic sin of "scandal." It is a sin for them to vote for Hillary Clinton. To quote the Catholic Catechism, "Therefore, they are guilty of scandal who establish laws or social structures leading to the decline of morals and the c...
Post a Comment
Read more