Skip to main content

Why does "Lowzer" video have one thumbs down and that's it?

    A live video of Sullivan's Dog "Lowzer" has been on my youtube channel TheDavidisaiah since around the time I started the channel. But the video was shot in 1994 and transferred to digital in 2010. I don't just put videos up for no reason. There must be something good or noteworthy about them in order for me to be compelled to place them on the internet for public viewing. "Lowzer" is not the worst songwriting accomplishment- especially by 1994 standards. It is just that this video is the only surviving recording I know of from the original group of which I was one of the guitar players. So while the recording quality, balance, and vocals are the not the best that they could be, it is the only recording of a not bad song. The recording has other positive attributes- the instrumental work, the freaky-deaky outro, and the stage lighting for example. If I had to say what would really help it, I would say that our lead singer Dan should have not backed away from really roaring on the vocals. It sounds too cautious and careful. I don't think that earns it a thumbs down, though. And to be honest, I think youtube pulled some shekinary over the number of hits the video actually got over time. I think the numbers might actually be in the hundreds and hundreds. It was one of the most popular videos on the channel at first. "For what reason?" you might say. Well, if it's listenable over and over, then it's practically not a bad song or recording. I think it's not the worst thing I ever heard actually. The lyrics are not poetry. They're not supposed to be, though. They're song lyrics. It communicates a specific experience that if one experienced that, it would be kind of hard to explain to others- especially if ghosts tried to take you, etc.
    "Lowzer" doesn't mean loser, either. I think that's why we called it "Lowzer" or "Lozer." The word could perhaps indicate someone who could be easily confused for a loser. The video should receive more thumbs up than what it has. It was a good songwriting accomplishment. It think it is very ballsy as well- goes right up to the line in terms of acceptability in terms of songwriting best practices.
   On the other hand, Dan's singing here is actually an artistic and sensitive approach to music. The gentleness conveyed is actually expressing care and caution- as if the narrator of the song is an eyewitness or friend who witnessed a scenario (like as suggested by the second person point of view in verse 2), and the scenario requires understanding...a scenario that's very very delicate perhaps and needs someone to be cautious and careful. The vocal projection and mix/balance is simply what I was commenting on above.




Sullivan's Dog, live performance of original song "Lowzer" at the Onalaska Omnicenter in Onalaska WI.  7-13-94
LOWZER    (lyrics)
The ghosts ,the ghosts have all but taken me
I try to say
The sky, the sky is falling down on me
I walk away
The sea, the sea has almost taken me
I'm washed away
The ground, the ground has surely swallowed me
I walk away
CHORUS
Grate your hands on the broken glass of yesterday
VERSE 2
The dark, the dark has nearly swallowed you
You try to say
Your friends, your friends have all abandoned you
They walked away
The cold, cold has nearly frozen you
You turn away
The guilt, the guilt has all but emptied you
I try to say

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...

Is Anybody Thinking Whatsoever?

See my comments below......    Let me explain further. According to Catholic dogma/teaching, they must oppose abortion "in all forms."  See the Catholic Catechism, which clearly states in 2272  "Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life"  Therefore, Catholics CANNOT vote for Hillary Clinton. If they don't like Donald Trump they have to find an independent party they agree with and vote for that person. They would be sinning according to their own religious worldview if they actually voted for Hillary Clinton.  link to Catholic Catechism  (on abortion)    Catholics should also consider the Catholic sin of "scandal." It is a sin for them to vote for Hillary Clinton. To quote the Catholic Catechism, "Therefore, they are guilty of scandal who establish laws or social structures leading to the decline of morals and the c...