I'm not a pedophile or any kind of a weirdo

I don't have the classic traits of a pedophile as widely known. So, I'm not a pedophile in any capacity [so I don't have that tendency], nor am I any kind of weirdo. I'm not a pederast or a gay either. I was never labelled with the psychiatric label of "pedophile" by any medical practitioner. If I was labelled something by them, it was not "pedophile." I'm not a child molester, either. I don't watch or have child pornography. If I have criminal convictions, it is not for child molestation or pornography. So I'm not a pedophile or any kind of child molester. I don't jerk off to gay porn or child porn. I'm not a registered sex offender, which is to say I was never convicted and asked to register as a sex offender.
They (these pedophiles) have a psychiatric disorder as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders http://www.jaapl.org/content/42/4/404.full I don't have that mental disorder, so.

Comments

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood. Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered. Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam). In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus. That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this. The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one," Lutwak v. United States, 344 U. S. 604 , 344 U. S. 619 (1953); Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 , 391 U. S. 135 (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153 (1976), that ...

This performance of "Lowzer" is better than the other performance of "Lozer"

So I uncovered and uploaded another different "live" performance of the Sullivan's Dog song "Lowzer" from our days of performing (notice how I play with the spelling on purpose to upset people who take things too seriously?) Please disregard my complaining in the previous post about the vocal balance in the other version and about it being the only surviving version. Praise God this other version exists so people can hear a version closer to how it should really sound. Oh yeah, for those who don't know, I am the guitar player on the left hand side who is difficult to see, but I am not the bass player on the left who can be prominently seen. My playing can be heard quite well in the intro, though. And the video URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T10OtiZFOZA&feature=youtu.be

ThiS iS hOw wE HAve To coMmuniCAte riGht NOW

Search This Blog