Skip to main content

New Edits in "A Dragon Comes As Well: a memoir"

     I have gone so far as to perform some edits in the already-published combined edition of A Dragon Comes As Well: a memoir. As pertaining to the section about the so-called "book of destiny" (and in regards to the problems I've already written about in my blog here, pertaining to that), I will present the edited version of that section in the book right here:

   In the books of scholarly commentary on the book of Isaiah, as pertaining to chapter 34 to be exact, there is an opinion among some that a so-called “Book of Destiny” from Hebrew literature and beliefs ( a belief with its basis in the Scriptures as found in Psalm 40:8; 139:16, Malachi 3:16, Daniel 7:10, and Revelation 20:12), is the Scroll or Book of the Lord referred to in Isaiah 34:16. In the commentary by John N. Oswalt,[1] the writer posits the “Book of Destiny” as one of four possibilities as to what the book of the Lord in Isaiah 34:16 is. I am not so ostentatious as to claim that the Semantolkino’hara book is the literal Book of Destiny copied from the one in heaven, for that book is supposed to have the names of those granted eternal life, as per Revelation 20:12.  I can go so far, though, as to say that it was in God’s direct will that I write it, and that it is a “Destiny’s Child,”- a book whose very materials for synthesis were birthed by the flow of destiny, or the hand of God on the events which came to pass (and a study thereof). I cannot go as far as Muhammad of Islam did when he claimed that his Qur’an was copied from a heavenly tablet, the Umm Al-kitab, (transmitted from the tablet itself to Allah to the angel Gabriel to Muhammad himself to his followers). I do not claim my book was copied that way, but I know that the book has much to say about God’s power, sovereignty, and providence. If there is a duplicate of something in heaven, even one little thing, that remains to be seen or known about in the afterlife. I don’t make any claim as to canonicity, and the fact that I don’t make any such claim was made abundantly clear in the book itself. 




[1] Oswalt, John N., The Book of Isaiah Chapters 1-39, (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1986), 617-18


   Another problem that has been bothering me, concerning which I had to perform edits, was the problem of real live people possibly being the symbolic personal-level fulfillment of Isaiah 34:14 ("Ziim and Iim"of the 1599 Geneva Bible translation). In the edited version I have accounted for the fact that the scene and people in question could simply have been thus spoken of in advance in "Black Sheep Rise," the song which I have posited as the personal prophetic buffer which takes the Biblical weight off of everything.
   The new edits will be present in the copies for sale within about two days' time from now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Night Fever," new song of mine could have many biblical implications

    Many people think of going to do something for the Lord like the preach the gospel, but will they really consider what the backlash would or could be like against them in many forms?     During my years of preaching with and alongside Third Street Ministries the typical level of discomfort normally experienced was just the prodding of scoffers and mockers in the mission field. It was kept from encroaching on our personal lives for an extended time, even despite posting videos. My testimony would indicate just how cautious, circumspect, and in agreement with your fellow believers you have to be in order to avoid a problem. That is especially true if you are working at the "trenches" level of confronting the unbelieving world.     In this new song "Night Fever," I just describe in vague terms one day in July 2011 when my ministry efforts with them finally got derailed more seriously. Tom of 1tmoch fame called my cellphone (or we called each other) and I planned to

A Song No One Knew Could Be About John the Baptist

     I’ve recently come to the conclusion that “One More Try” by George Michael could have one interpretation as being about John the Baptist. This would indeed a highly compelling interpretation of the song. The song seems to depict a man, sung in first person narrative (I interpret as being John the Baptist), upset by his previous teacher (I interpret here as Jesus), and trying to reason with another person he wants as his lover. This third person, (the lover), for the sake of my interpretation could be Salome, or someone else. The way that the video depicts him confined in a room with stained glass windows makes me feel like it’s John singing from prison before he was beheaded. He’s saying that it’s too bad he can’t see Jesus any longer, and could she please give him one more try even though he’s behind bars.       I happen to like this interpretation a lot, because it makes John the Baptist look like a rockstar. He was indeed said by Christ as being “Elijah who was to come” Matthe

Say "Hello" to the Man Behind the Curtain (He's the stalker you wanted to know about)

    I'm sure that a lot of people have sensed or noticed heightened vigilance in society over "stalkers." What most people have not probably considered is that the cause of the phenomenon of concern could be subterfuge of subconscious mechanisms (in coordination possibly with covert or subliminal efforts by corporations) by which people's unconscious guilt for participating with, being compliant with, complicit with, (or otherwise silently approving) harmful systems that do actually "stalk" average citizens for real, is projected on someone other than the real cause of their inner distress, worry, and heavy-laden guilt. These systems could include corporate America, the banking industry, the government (the IRS mostly comes to mind- thank you David Foster Wallace for The Pale King, the book from which I took down some nice notes to go over later, mainly concerning the political/economic theories of Alexis de Tocqueville, participatory democracy, corporations