Skip to main content

Why I Don't Have to Believe My Own Press

   As a freelance writer, composer, and musician, I don't have to "believe my own press," which is to say that neither commercial success (number of units sold), number of social media followers, nor endorsements or press coverage dictate any indication of success commensurate to the level of validation needed to continue on with my work. Those things do not and cannot validate or effectively reject my work, and the following are the reasons why.
1. If the point of a venture or project is communicating to the public higher values and principles such as freedom of speech, then popularity and/or monetary success of the spokesperson or title is hardly the concern.
2. Documented popularity is not always equal to quality, prestige, or even success.
3. I may define "success" however I want to.
4. Sales (commerical success) is/are not equal to quality, prestige, or success necessarily (or the effectiveness of an outreach).
5. To the extent that people don't read or listen to my works, then to that same extent is the quality of them unknown and therefore not discerned in the first place.
6. The market is subject to changes in trends and fads. Works of art are not. They could be, but don't have to be.
7. There is a distinction between pure entertainment and art/literature. The common folk of society budget part of their money for entertainment typically notwithstanding the artistic merit of what they are going to consume. I don't create works for the sole purpose of entertainment, so that places my works outside of the mainstream market.
8. The mainstream media marginalizes Christian conservatives such as myself quite quickly and rather automatically.
9. There is biblical support for being fruitful, beneficial, productive, and helpful outside of mere market supply and demand swings, as well as for the idea that our right standing is not gauged by popularity. For example, Jesus said in Matthew 6:25, "Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing?" Also, He said in John 15:18-20, "If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, 'A slave is not greater than his master.' If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word, they will keep yours also." The popularity of an idea can hardly be an indication of its truth, especially if, as 1 Corinthians 1:18 says, "For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."
10. Not all works that have merit have immediate commercial success or are appreciated in their time. The same goes for the artists who create them. http://www.onlineuniversities.com/blog/2010/11/10-incredible-artists-unappreciated-in-their-time/  A great example is the 1939 film "The Wizard of Oz" which was initially a box office failure. During the first box office release, the movie tallied a one million dollar loss for the studio.
11. Social media following and viral success are also no indicators of actual fame, fortune, or real world followers. The reason why is that the internet is like a separate, different, and fake world from the real one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Link to my new book- "The Semantolkino'hara and Its Applications"

  The book has a been long time in the works, and you can get it now on magcloud. Thanks to the many who helped.    This book is what The Glorious Scenario magazine was supposed to be. It makes a more concise statement than a multi-issue journal, though. The raw creative materials involved in the discussion have many applications and tie-ins across subject areas. The template of the semantolkino'hara will give its user acumen. The Semantolkino'hara and Its Applications: The Eschaton, Musicology, and The Name of God By David Black 122 pages, published 10/10/2014 A practical music theory and composition system became a template for understanding a union between disciplines- music history, musicology, eschatology, social science, and more. The whole effort started with a simple serial analysis of Trish Phan's "A Letter" and became a huge undertaking once the implications...

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...