Skip to main content

News Flash- Marriage across race lines is not itself immoral

   I have encountered people in my life who hold to the dogmatic notion that marriage across racial lines is immoral according to "The Bible." I've studied the topic from Genesis to Revelation and I would have to admit that there is no such command which prohibits people from marrying those of other races just based on the category of race or nationality alone. It is therefore morally acceptable for believers in Christ to marry people of other races and nationalities if the spouse is a believer in Christ as well (2 Corinthians 6:14). There is concern throughout the Scriptures, however, when it comes to believers in the true and living God marrying foreigners who worship other gods because of the fact that the foreigners might/will turn their spouses to false gods and idols. One does not even need to understand various paradigms of covenant theology to understand this. One need only look at the various obvious examples which are prominently featured in the arguments concerning interracial marriage.
   Deuteronomy 7 is one of the first direct commands in which God directs people to avoid marrying foreigners. However, the passage must be considered in its full context, not just the surrounding passage, but in historical context, and in the context of redemptive and covenental history.
Deuteronomy 7-
When the Lord your God brings you into the land where you are entering to possess it, and clears away many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and stronger than you,and when the Lord your God delivers them before you and you [a]defeat them, then you shall[b]utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them and show no favor to them.Furthermore, you shall not intermarry with them; you shall not give your [c]daughters to [d]their sons, nor shall you take [e]their daughters for your [f]sons. For [g]they will turn your [h]sons away from[i]following Me to serve other gods; then the anger of the Lord will be kindled against you and He will quickly destroy you. But thus you shall do to them: you shall tear down their altars, and smash their sacred pillars, and hew down their [j]Asherim, and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for His [k]own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the [l]earth.
[endquote]  
   It should be fairly obvious that the command was specifically given to the children of Israel on their journey through the wilderness to Canaan and concerns how they were to deal with the foreigners who occupied the land which they were to inherit- they were to obliterate them completely. Marriage would have been completely out of the question as the idolatry of the nations had been so prolonged and reprehensible to the Lord God, that it called for judgment in the form of military conquest. Specifically, verse 7:4 gives the reason why Israel was not to marry any of the foreigners from those nations- the spouses would cause them to turn to and serve other gods. Furthermore, the commands to completely obliterate them preclude the possibility of marriages being formed with them. 
   In no way does the passage mean that Christians have license to conquer unbelieving countries by brute force simply because they worship other gods. The biblical New Testament commandments call for us preach the gospel to all nations. I am reminded of Greg Bahnsen's writing on Theonomy, in which although he gave lip service to postmilllenialism, he insisted that the Christian faith must be spread to the whole world by the preaching of the gospel, not the sword, before Jesus returns. What we see in Deuteronomy 7 was part of the Mosaic Covenant (insofar as it was part of the pentateuch, or the books of the law) which was temporal and temporary, and replaced with a better covenant at the cross of Jesus Christ. Ceremonial commands and commands which have to do with preserving Israel's national identity and distinction were done away with (or fulfilled) at the cross of Jesus Christ. The destruction of the temple of Jerusalem in 70 AD brought an end to the Mosaic economy completely in the most practical and necessary sense. 
   Even a study of Ezra and Nehemiah will reveal that concerns about interracial/international marriage had to do with the influence of false religion and idolatry on the people of God. 
   I will have to finish this later. It is a huge topic of interest to me.
   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apologies to the Trump Campaign

   I received your messages (Donald Trump and son), I just haven't checked that email account often enough. I am well aware that someone with you follows my posts here, ever since my original idea to have a wealthy man run for President has come to fruition somehow. The only thing I would have to communicate is that this was never supposed to be a purely political blog. I started the blog to write about whatever I wanted to, or whatever I was interested in. The "general topic" theme gives me the freedom to write freely across subject areas. If my ideas have helped you somehow, I did not realize that. Let me see what I can do to help you further, though. I think you should continue giving America a message of hope based on ideas and values our country was founded on, and you won't be able to really go wrong. Too often Democrats win elections not by their own merit, but by a smear campaign against their opponent. That's what they've tried to do, it looks like. ...

The Process Used in Writing "The Semantolkino'hara" book

     People wanted to learn the process by which I wrote "The Semantolkino'hara," and they seem to think the process is more valuable than the content of the book. Well....the book is really quite good and well-written. (It can be purchased here: http://www.magcloud.com/browse/issue/825648  ) The musical materials discussed are invaluable. The way the book came about is as interesting as the process used, and the way it came was infused together with the process used. The introduction in the book describes how I was thinking about everything, and kind of explains the process:       FROM THE INTRODUCTION:       "The writing of this book started with the idea of subjecting certain musical materials of my life to a method of human conjunctive analysis combining the objective tools of musical analysis with subjective human studies and theology, allowing for the possibility of reinterpretable studies. After a preliminary amount of inv...

This performance of "Lowzer" is better than the other performance of "Lozer"

   So I uncovered and uploaded another different "live" performance of the Sullivan's Dog song "Lowzer" from our days of performing (notice how I play with the spelling on purpose to upset people who take things too seriously?) Please disregard my complaining in the previous post about the vocal balance in the other version and about it being the only surviving version. Praise God this other version exists so people can hear a version closer to how it should really sound. Oh yeah, for those who don't know, I am the guitar player on the left hand side who is difficult to see, but I am not the bass player on the left who can be prominently seen. My playing can be heard quite well in the intro, though.      And the video URL:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T10OtiZFOZA&feature=youtu.be