Skip to main content

The Medicine Fight is About Lieben

   At this point no one should wonder why I had to blow the whistle on the psychiatric industry as largely a junk science establishment motivated by profits from harmful pharmaceuticals. What escapes attention often, is the underlying reasons why people weaponize medicine against others. I think the reasons often have to do with lieben. I use lieben as opposed to its English equivalent here because the connotations are so precise and its affect has finesse. It is always disheartening to me to hear about people who were told to go on pills after they felt lieben towards me, for me, or about me. This should not be going on. The idea of people medicating lieben to make it go away is ludicrous, but sadly the practice actually goes on. Society has replaced sensible remedies such as face-to-face negotiations with sad, brutal, and harmful practices such pills with laundry lists of dangerous side effects. Pills often produce the very symptoms that the disease is supposed to be comprised of. I would not write here of what I am not sure, which is to say, you must believe me.
   The notion of weaponizing medicine against those who have lieben was the foundational idea for my novel The January Stop. I wrote about it not because I support the practice, but simply to expose it as the evil that it is.
   Neither is the idea any kind of new practice. A study of The Compendium of the Witches revealed to me that the practice has been going on for centuries.  Castration, chemical castration, and physical separation are a few of the remedies that the witches used against people who had lieben with one another. Witches didn't like lieben and wanted to stop lieben. Notice that all three of those things have been practices in our modern psychiatric industry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...

This performance of "Lowzer" is better than the other performance of "Lozer"

   So I uncovered and uploaded another different "live" performance of the Sullivan's Dog song "Lowzer" from our days of performing (notice how I play with the spelling on purpose to upset people who take things too seriously?) Please disregard my complaining in the previous post about the vocal balance in the other version and about it being the only surviving version. Praise God this other version exists so people can hear a version closer to how it should really sound. Oh yeah, for those who don't know, I am the guitar player on the left hand side who is difficult to see, but I am not the bass player on the left who can be prominently seen. My playing can be heard quite well in the intro, though.      And the video URL:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T10OtiZFOZA&feature=youtu.be