Skip to main content

They Got to Amanda Bynes Harder Now. Stop this nonsense

   Amanda Bynes was placed in an involuntary psychiatric hold, also called a "5150," a legal device used to trample and traipse on people's rights. This was done to her apparently just for tweeting about her father, and trying to explain it away from mind control. Any time someone mentions mind control to authorities, they tend to do a "5150" on that person. Clearly people did not want her saying what she said and that is the cause of this.They have completely floored her by disregarding her first amendment rights, and it is in a vile attempt to control her behavior. She definitely has the right to express concern that there may be a mind-control implant in her head.  Are we at a stone age level of technology? I don't think so. We are in an age of high technology. Her freedom to express that concern is part of her first amendment rights. Look at what happened. She was treated worse for just saying anything.
   All of this is completely unacceptable. Please release this person from captivity if that is her wish. Her human rights are being violated by an arbitrary arrest and arbitrary hold. Typically a 5150 decision is made by the police, but they are not qualified to make a psychiatric diagnosis. Therefore, it is arbitrary. They simple follow through on things mechanically as a matter of procedure, and it is normally not very nice to do to people.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/12/showbiz/amanda-bynes-mental-hold/index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/10/11/report-amanda-bynes-put-under-involuntary-psychiatric-hold/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Types and the Fall of Man Argument

   There will be some who will want to say that I was being illogical or unbiblical when I wrote the post about how personality differences get misunderstood.  Their argument is basically that differing personalities are a consequence of the Fall of Man- a consequence of the DNA getting disordered.  Therefore, they will say, that people who don't fit the "perfect personality" are sinful. God created one man, they will say, with a perfect personality (Adam).  In truth, they can cite Adam, Eve, and Jesus.  That argument is not correct, and I will stand my ground on this.    The reason why they are not correct is because they are making the unwarranted assumption all of Adam's descendants would have had the same personality had the Fall never happened. I can say with a fair degree of certainty that had the Fall never happened, there would have been different kinds of people with different personalities, it just would have been a more perfect world. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Link to my new book- "The Semantolkino'hara and Its Applications"

  The book has a been long time in the works, and you can get it now on magcloud. Thanks to the many who helped.    This book is what The Glorious Scenario magazine was supposed to be. It makes a more concise statement than a multi-issue journal, though. The raw creative materials involved in the discussion have many applications and tie-ins across subject areas. The template of the semantolkino'hara will give its user acumen. The Semantolkino'hara and Its Applications: The Eschaton, Musicology, and The Name of God By David Black 122 pages, published 10/10/2014 A practical music theory and composition system became a template for understanding a union between disciplines- music history, musicology, eschatology, social science, and more. The whole effort started with a simple serial analysis of Trish Phan's "A Letter" and became a huge undertaking once the implications...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nice Dissenting Opinion on the Fairness of the Criminal Justice System

   I was recently having a conversation with someone about the possibility for unreliability and/or unfairness in the criminal justice system. I was reminded of this quote from a Supreme Court case which is from Justice Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion. The case was Darden v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 168 (1986). Obviously he's talking about the Supreme Court level, but if this could be said about their accuracy, then how shall we communicate about fairness at the trial court level? "JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Although the Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant only "a fair trial [and] not a perfect one,"  Lutwak v. United States,   344 U. S. 604 ,  344 U. S. 619  (1953);  Bruton v. United States,   391 U. S. 123 ,  391 U. S. 135  (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since  Gregg v. Georgia,   428 U. S. 153  (1976), that ...
Post a Comment
Read more